Wednesday, May 18, 2022
No Result
View All Result
TimesNewsNetworks.com
  • Home
  • World
    • Politics
    • U.S.
    • Opinion
  • Business
  • Energy
  • Health
  • Science
  • Tech
  • Sports
  • Food
  • Arts
  • Style
  • Books
  • Real Estate
  • Magazine
  • Travel
  • Video
  • Home
  • World
    • Politics
    • U.S.
    • Opinion
  • Business
  • Energy
  • Health
  • Science
  • Tech
  • Sports
  • Food
  • Arts
  • Style
  • Books
  • Real Estate
  • Magazine
  • Travel
  • Video
No Result
View All Result
TimesNewsNetworks.com
No Result
View All Result

Supreme Court backs Texas inmate in execution prayer case

March 24, 2022
in Politics
Reading Time: 2 mins read
A A

The Supreme Court has been increasingly dismissive of stay requests from prisoners facing execution, but last September it granted such a stay in the case of John Ramirez, who was set to die for the 2004 murder of a 46-year-old Corpus Christi convenience store clerk, Pablo Castro.

Lower courts ruled that allowing Ramirez’s pastor to stand near the inmate and pray silently in the death chamber was sufficient to accommodate Ramirez’s religious rights. But an ideologically broad array of justices disagreed, joining Chief Justice John Roberts’ opinion backing a more sweeping interpretation of the government’s duty to cater to the religious practices of prisoners.

“There is a rich history of clerical prayer at the time of a prisoner’s execution, dating back well before the founding of our Nation,” Roberts wrote. “By passing RLUIPA, Congress determined that prisoners like Ramirez have a strong interest in avoiding substantial burdens on their religious exercise, even while confined. … Because it is possible to accommodate Ramirez’s sincere religious beliefs without delaying or impeding his execution, we conclude that the balance of equities and the public interest favor his requested relief.”

Texas argued that allowing a minister to pray out loud during an executions could lead to a verbal statement that could further traumatize victims present of witnesses or prevent communication among those carrying out the death penalty. Texas officials also argued that the minister could injure the inmate or interfere with medical procedures. But Roberts said those arguments were at odds with past experience, including the history of both verbal prayer and laying on of hands at many prior executions.

Roberts’ 22-page opinion did not address what accommodation for ministers might be required during other types of executions, such as those carried out by firing squad, electrocution or gas chamber.

Associate Justice Clarence Thomas dissented on procedural grounds, arguing that Ramirez failed to properly raise his objection to the efforts to prevent his minister from praying aloud or touching him during the execution.

ShareTweetSendPinShare

Related Posts

Politics

‘She’s not racist’: House Republicans dismiss furor over Stefanik immigration ad

May 18, 2022
Politics

Behind Biden’s decision to not name names over the Buffalo shooting

May 18, 2022
Politics

Election Results 2022: GOP picks swing-state nominees for key midterm races

May 17, 2022
Politics

Judge mulls prospect of collision between Jan. 6 committee report and Oath Keepers trial

May 17, 2022
Politics

Bill de Blasio and other New York Democrats eye rare, open congressional seat

May 17, 2022
Politics

‘Everybody Condemns the Act. But Do You Condemn the Ideas Behind the Act?’

May 17, 2022
Politics

Opinion | The Ugly Backlash to Brown v. Board of Ed That No One Talks About

May 17, 2022
Politics

Ukraine aid splinters the GOP

May 17, 2022
Next Post

Fix the Planet newsletter: Solving charging anxiety for electric cars

TimesNewsNetworks.com

Times News Networks is an online news portal that aims to provide the latest news about varies aspects from around the world. We promise to share only high quality content from the world's recent happenings . Feel free to get in touch with us!

What’s New Here!

  • ‘She’s not racist’: House Republicans dismiss furor over Stefanik immigration ad
  • When will we learn from our COVID frauds and failures?
  • How will the interoperability rule transform value-based care?

Trending Now

  • ‘She’s not racist’: House Republicans dismiss furor over Stefanik immigration ad
  • When will we learn from our COVID frauds and failures?
  • How will the interoperability rule transform value-based care?
  • Write for Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • DMCA

Copyright ©️ All Rights Reserved | TimesNewsNetworks.com

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • World
    • Politics
    • U.S.
    • Opinion
  • Business
  • Energy
  • Health
  • Science
  • Tech
  • Sports
  • Food
  • Arts
  • Style
  • Books
  • Real Estate
  • Magazine
  • Travel
  • Video

Copyright ©️ All Rights Reserved | TimesNewsNetworks.com