Credits: Unsplash
The term "superfood" was coined for marketing purposes in the early 1900s, lacking any regulated scientific definition.
Credits: Unsplash
Whilst many "superfoods" are indeed nutritious, scientific evidence doesn't support claims of miraculous health benefits or disease prevention.
Credits: Unsplash
Foods labelled as "super" typically contain high levels of beneficial compounds like antioxidants, vitamins, minerals and omega-3 fatty acids.
Credits: Unsplash
Popular examples include blueberries, kale, quinoa and chia seeds, which offer genuine nutritional benefits but aren't magical cure-alls.
Credits: Unsplash
Research shows that no single food can provide all the nutrients needed for optimal health, regardless of its "super" status.
Credits: Unsplash
The theory's primary flaw is suggesting that certain foods have exceptional powers beyond their actual nutritional content.
Credits: Unsplash
Nutritionists emphasise that a balanced, varied diet is more beneficial than focusing on individual "superfoods".
Credits: Unsplash
The superfood concept remains predominantly a marketing tool, though many designated foods are genuinely nutritious when part of a balanced diet.
Credits: Unsplash
Have you visited Badami in Karnataka?
Credits: Unsplash